In these difficult economic times, sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have invaded our television screens and the Internet as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a kind of escapism for readers. Although it seems like sensationalism is just starting to make waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has influenced viewers and contributed to media bias since the days of the penny press. The long history of sensationalism has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential on reporting practices today. Along with the influence exerted on reader sensationalism, media bias has and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come. Sensationalism is described as “the use of shocking material: the practice of emphasizing the most sinister, shocking, and emotive aspects of something under discussion or investigation, especially by the media” (“Sensationalism,” 2009 ). This tactic has been used for ages. Whether it's the stories told about a monster that eats bad children or the dangerous methods of communism, sensationalism is everywhere. Sensationalism began in the era of the Pulitzer and Hearst newspapers. Their feud would introduce sensationalism into the media and impact the lives of many people. Joseph Pulitzer, who helped bring sensationalism to the forefront, was born with humble beginnings. Born on April 10, 1847, Pulitzer arrived in America in 1867 with no money and was drafted into the Union Army (Morris, 2010). After serving in the war, Pulitzer began his career as a journalist. He started at a foreign language newspaper in St. Louis. During his time at the foreign language newspaper, he was introduced......in the middle of the newspaper......people have to come forward on the side of their backers. Newspapers and evening news shows generally do not have the bipartisan qualities they claim to have. Newspapers and evening news shows became a business. They no longer follow the values ​​of public services that they once defended (Sensationalism, 2005). Instead of being the fourth branch of government, they are just like any other money-making business. It is no longer about making the truth known; rather, it is a race for dollars and control. Sensationalism is fueled solely by money and popularity. If a media outlet gains widespread popularity, it can swing votes and influence voters. Sensationalism has already affected many political situations. It turned out that sensationalism spreads like a virus. If sensationalism is not controlled, the media will in no way be able to act as spokespersons for the people..