“What evidence is there to prove that new ways of thinking about what is already known lead to new facts?” “What are the justifications that it is more important to discover new ways of thinking about known facts? » The two concepts, discovering new ways of thinking about what is already known and discovering new facts, are correlated as knowledge derives from both, one leading to the other. I agree with this statement because in most situations one person's findings tend to build on another person's findings and so on. By discovering new ways of thinking about what is already known, new facts and ideas will begin to emerge since great attention and depth is given to the area of ​​interest; therefore, it reveals more details that can lead to new discoveries. To examine this statement in more detail, one must understand that the difference between the two concepts is that new ways of thinking about what is already known refer to the rethinking of what is already recognized. old concepts; however, the discovery of new data and facts refers to the observation of completely raw information, new to humans. I believe that discovering new ways of thinking about known facts is more important because it improves what we already have, whereas discovering new facts will contain many flaws and misconceptions; However, it can be countered that discovering new ways of thinking about known facts requires having data to examine. Mathematics is an area of ​​knowledge where the statement is applicable because it is a subject formed by different ideas merged together. and put into complex formulas. By applying these principles, mathematicians discover new facts by rethinking known information. Well...... middle of article......, composed of different knowledge. In the end, I showed that in different fields of knowledge, the discovery of new ways of thinking about what is already known is more important than the discovery of new data and facts. The two concepts are correlated because one depends on the other; However, it is not to the same extent that rethinking past discoveries has improved our knowledge of today's world and made it more concrete by leading people, such as scientists and mathematicians, to new discoveries, unknown to man. These new discoveries are introduced by new ways of thinking due to the great attention given to the area of ​​interest. There is one exception to this rule: in biology, a branch of natural science, new data and facts are more important than new ways of thinking about what is already known, since theories are created from new observations..