Today, China is ranked as the most populous nation in the world. It is also true that China is one of the countries whose economy is growing very quickly. It is absolutely imperative to note that capitalism has been dominant in this country, allowing it to not only grow stronger, but also gain great regional and global influence. Even though China has rediscovered its elements of ancient tradition while repackaging them to suit modernity, it is evident that the visions adopted are very different from those of the West. Judge Dee's famous cases are a perfect publication that enlightens the reader about the various social, political and moral problems that existed in China decades ago and how to solve them. Comparing legal issues in China several decades ago, a thin line can be drawn. This is because nothing has changed much in terms of social, political and moral perspectives. Judge Dee's famous cases borrow heavily from Chinese culture, which defines the standard morals and values ​​of its people. Therefore, the legal system of this country seems to rely entirely on the moral standards set out to reprimand wrongdoers. Morality is one of the most fundamental questions raised in Judge Dee's famous cases. It is imperative to note that the moral dimension revealed in this book arises from the Chinese culture on display. Chinese culture is a crucial issue that comes to light as Judge Dee continues to carry out his noble duty. This sourcebook provides the reader with a perspective of Chinese culture. During the most notable of the Tang dynasties, Judge Dee was a famous magistrate and statesman from a city called Chang-ping. Dee's fame was associated middle of paper...... with the death mourning unit through execution and the exposure of offenders to the public. It was also a way of cleansing the murdered people of any indignities that might have remained. All crimes committed throughout the book have been solved. The major crimes highlighted in this book are three in number and they are criminal in nature. However, in my opinion, the resulting consequences were neither fair nor just. This is typical of the fact that, in making his final decision, Judge Dee relied on Asian influence. This could have been misleading because it depended on ghosts, dreams, and superstitions, which are unreliable sources of information for making a critical judgment. Torturing guilty people to demand confessions raises a moral question. Indeed, it can force an innocent person to confess to a crime they did not commit...