The law regularly meets the moral gauges that most voters subscribe to. In any case, laws, like feelings, will deviate from good. Our pre-civil war laws of subjection and, therefore, the ancient laws of social approach of contemporary African nations are immensely obvious specimens of laws that stray from what is good. Finally, being good doesn't just mean doing "everything that the general public recognizes." In any general public, a large part of individuals are satisfied with measures which correspond to measures, even moral ones. However, the standards of conduct in public spaces will deviate from what is good. A complete society will become morally degenerate. Reich is perhaps a model of a degenerate idealistic society. Furthermore, if to be good one had to do “whatever the public recognizes,” then to pursue what is ethical one would have to be driven to implement what society recognizes. To choose what I should have for certain when removing the fetus, as an example, perhaps I should be asked to study Yankee society and then change my beliefs, regardless of what society recognizes. However, no one ever tries to choose an ethical question by looking at the big picture. Furthermore, the lack of social agreement on certain issues makes it unrealistic to equate morality with what society recognizes. Some people accept premature birth, but others do not. In case being good is