“Morality is not the doctrine of how we can make ourselves happy, but of how we can make ourselves worthy of happiness.” Two things that are not compatible are what an individual should do and what he wants to do. When an individual does what he wants, he finds himself on a path that will lead him to immediate happiness but which will not benefit him in the long term. On the other hand, when the individual does what he should do, it will bring him a feeling of discomfort and unhappiness, but it will benefit him in the end. The goal of Kantianism is to tell us that morality is not intended to make us happy but to do everything. the goal is to do the right thing just for the sake of doing it. Ultimately, doing the right thing will lead us to our happiness. Kant said that we are determined to know what is good or what is bad through our own law and using ourselves as our own guide. As individuals, we will determine our own behavior rather than letting someone tell us how we should act because of their expectations of us. Doing the right thing for the right reason is very important to a Kantian. The morality of the Kantians is of no consequence. A Kantian's actions are based on that person's will and not on the consequences that accompany the actions we take and our behavior. Doing what is right simply because it is right is the only reason we should do the right thing. For Kant, there are two types of good. Intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic motivation involves us engaging in an activity because it will bring us personal rewards with intrinsic motivation we perform activities to be a reward to ourselves rather than to be rewarded from the outside world. Extrinsic motivators, on the other hand, occur when we become motivated in the middle of a paper......and even though students know they are not prepared for an exam, they will continue to study until that they want to do it. feel comfortable with the subject. Receiving a passing grade by cheating will not feel any better than receiving the passing grade and knowing that I studied hard and deserve that grade. In conclusion, Kant proposed a theory called the categorical imperative which has three rules. Moral and universal laws, meaning it affects everyone, you know something is wrong when you see everyone doing it and you treat the actions as themselves rather than aftereffects. Kant was concerned with the motive or good behind the choices we make rather than the consequences that flow from those actions. When it comes to cheating, Kant thinks that his immoral cheating is wrong and there is no definite way to defend it and say that it is okay to cheat..