blog




  • Essay / Genetically modified plants - 1187

    Genetically modified plants, or GM plants, are plants whose DNA has been artificially modified, usually by synthesizing the original DNA of the plant with that of another organism . To do this, contemporary scientists search for the desired gene in a huge, already established database that contains the complete genome of a wide spectrum of known organisms. Once discovered, the gene is usually replicated at an exponential rate through the use of PCR (polymerase chain reaction). The process involves heating the DNA, which forces it to divide. As they cool, the primers bind to the strands, allowing DNA polymerase to create two complementary strands for each existing strand, creating two identical macromolecules. Then, restriction enzymes are used to cut the DNA of both organisms (the DNA of the PCR and the DNA of the plant into which the gene is to be implanted), consequently allowing the aforementioned DNA synthesis . This recombinant DNA is then copied and replicated by the plant and, through artificial breeding techniques, passed down from generation to generation, thereby preserving the desired attributes. That being said, despite much controversy and speculation about whether genetically modified plants are ethical, safe, and healthy, their many benefits appear to outweigh these speculations and support the opposing argument, thus suggesting that genetic modification of plants should be pursued for the net. improvement of contemporary society. The main advantages induced by the genetic modification of plants are essentially economic. Thanks to this, agriculture is made much more efficient. This allows farmers to produce higher yields and more surpluses in a smaller amount of paper...... way to define what this ambiguous abuse is to establish impartial information programs, so that each citizen has the opportunity to develop a unique and individual ethical consensus on the issue. Then there should be a democratic vote on issues related to genetically modified crops, the results of which would dictate where to draw the line. As for the health risks associated with potentially toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, the ideal would be to make them unnecessary. This could be possible through genetic alteration leading to crop resistance to weeds. If this was done for insects, why couldn't it be done for weeds as well? That being said, given that genetically modified crops are conducive in many respects and that there are plausible and pragmatic solutions and compromises regarding valid and controversial suspicions about them, their production should be approved and advocated..