For example, the bureaucratic political model is a notion that suggests that political members represent opinions based on their respected political ideology. Andrew Heywood stated that “political actors simply have opinions based on their own position and the interests of the organizations in which they work” (Heywood, 2011, p. 132). This reasoning might also be implicit in criminal justice systems that rely on these strict governmental and administrative procedures. The most obvious are the courts and prosecution stages, which can be a lengthy and complex process. Governance has also expanded the anti-crime agenda due to the accountability and privatization agenda, which has arguably led to a blurring of boundaries. For example, the private control and ownership of the probation service suggests that crime is a major and difficult problem to manage. Most importantly, privatization means a transfer of ownership from government to private sectors such as probation and the National Health Service. The government's privatization strategy indeed stems from a neoliberal economic governance system alongside the deregulation of financial markets and the reduction of public spending. This has resulted in similar functions within criminal justice systems.