While the conflicts of the novels belong to potential societies, the stifling pressure of societies' expectations and the progression towards idiosyncratic misery draws alarming parallels with that of the world today. Burgess and Huxley present areas in which governing states have usurped God as the architect of existence and dictate every facet of reality. The authors question the prioritization of social efficiency over individuation by describing the degradation of individualistic diversity in the service of conformity and standardization imposed within these societies. The polarization of these societies against the modern world is used decisively by Burgess and Huxley to highlight the potential for a perverse future where drugs become the reality and the devastating artifice of a civilization devoid of free will and freedom. ethical integrity. In both works, only Alex represents the prospect of slim hope: a limited dynamism for individuation within the limits of potentially despotic power.