The first perspective is that women are at a disadvantage in all sports. Some reiterate the difference between men and women in sport. This is influenced by the natural strength and power that men hold, comparable to that of women. Rodriguez wonders, "Is it because female athletes don't have what it takes to succeed in the sports world or could it be more of a societal problem?" This perspective appears to be a social problem based on the remarkable skills women have acquired in relation to apparent judgments on gender issues. The second perspective is the idea that women inherently deserve and deserve their right to equal attention and equal pay. “Sometimes the secret to equality is not affirmative action, but equality of conditions. It’s the shrug that says “what’s the difference?” The moment worth aspiring to is not when people celebrate the world-class female cricketer competing in relatively low-level men's professional cricket, but for the day when people know that she does and will not find it remarkable at all. » (Lawson). Lawson makes it her duty to confirm biased ideas against women in sport and to relay an alternative that is worth defending and worth fighting for. Both perspectives can be biased, but only one has factual evidence to support it. The second perspective examines a persistent question of gender. This problem is likely to evolve depending on the evolution of society.