Higher Court, the court summarized what constitutes quid pro quo sexual harassment, stating: A cause of action for quid pro quo sexual harassment involves the conduct more commonly considered sexual harassment, including for example, sexual propositions, unwarranted graphic discussions of sexual acts, and comments about the employee's body and the sexual uses that might be made of it. To state cause of action under this theory, it is sufficient to allege that a condition of employment was expressly or implicitly conditioned upon acceptance of unwelcome sexual advances from a supervisor” (Timothy Broderick and Katrina Saleen, 2008 ). This case relates to Debbie's situation, due to: offering sexual advances with the preposition of supervisor makes an employee's sexual conduct a condition of receiving benefits or