Life is essentially a constant victory over death. Even though this feat seems ideal, there is a section of society that wants to lose. Some of these people resort to assisted suicide in order to achieve their ultimate desires. Oregon, Washington, and Vermont are currently the only states allowing this act to be implemented. Generally considered synonymous with euthanasia, the most palpable difference between the two is who carries out the task. In euthanasia, a doctor will administer a lethal dose of medication, while assisted suicide is characterized by the patient administering it themselves. As the legalization issue has gained momentum, a general argument has formed in favor of the most popular views. Proponents believe in “death with dignity,” while opponents view assisted suicide as a gateway for doctors to kill their patients. As the first state to legalize assisted suicide, what perspectives did Oregon take into account when making its decision? The beginning of medical assistance in dying is attributed to Dr. Jack Kevorkian. He performed euthanasia, which ultimately led to assisted suicide. The idea that terminally ill and suffering patients could choose when to end their lives appealed to many, especially those whose friends or family suffered from debilitating illnesses. Over time, more countries and states have legalized assisted suicide and are continually refining the qualifications a person must meet to be eligible. Oregon's Death with Dignity Act passed with the narrowest of votes - 51% to 49% - in 1994; however, a measure that would have repealed the law was defeated by a vote of 60% to 40% in 1997 (Norman-Eady). The OLR research report outlines two sets of requirements patients must meet to be eligible to apply...... middle of article...... Business and 'doctors' experiences with the law on Death with Dignity in Oregon” are more valid than How to Die in Oregon for two main reasons. The authors are credible in the sense that the board and researchers are well trained and knowledgeable in the medical field. Additionally, the lack of emotional appeal indicates that there is less bias in their reports. With How to Die in Oregon, Peter Richardson's techniques were effective, but relied heavily on the audience's emotional response to the film. In the future, more research on the experience of assisted suicide in Washington and Vermont will be available, so the effects of its legalization will be easier to detect. Vermont's situation versus Oregon's versus Washington's situation will also show possible regional differences, if any. The procedure is carried out using barbiturates, but perhaps more effective methods could be researched.