This story presents a pattern of using multiple complicated actions, as the male speaker continually fails to obtain the information he needs. Furthermore, following each complicating action, a series of evaluations occurs, which rhetorically correspond to each complicating action. Furthermore, in terms of gender analysis, this discourse presents certain characteristics of institutional discourse. Police speech has more formal forms and lexical features associated with specific police speech. Furthermore, in terms of content, this discourse presents linguistic representations regarding legal issues, which imply the state's level of knowledge and information on the subject. These factors play a role in identifying this particular discourse as institutional.