Table of contentsIntroduction12 Angry Men: play versus filmThe evidenceStage directionsCharacters and their actionsConclusionIntroductionThroughout history, our country has always given 'a fair trial by jury where 12 randomly chosen U.S. citizens are chosen to serve on the jury. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose examines the dynamics at play in a jury room in the United States in the 1950s. It revolves around the opinions and mindsets of twelve different characters tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man charged with first degree premeditated homicide. In 1957, Twelve Angry Men was made into a film directed by Sidney Lumet. Although the play and the film have similarities, there are also many differences. The three most significant differences between the play and the film were the evidence, the settings, the characters and their actions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay 12 Angry Men: Game vs. Movie The Evidence The first main difference between the play and the movie is the evidence. In the play, Juror Eight declares that the boy who kills his father is "nineteen years old." The important piece of evidence is not the same in the film. In the movie it's still Juror 8 but it says the boy was eighteen. Another difference between the play and the film is that they are about the boy's father. In the play, the author does not mention his father at all, but in the film they decided to say that the boy's father was in prison for forgery. This is an important piece of evidence because not having a positive father figure in this boy's life may have greatly affected the actions he did when he was older. Another important piece of evidence concerned the old woman and her glasses. In the film, Juror Nine uses Juror Four as an example by telling him about the marks on either side of his nose. Juror Nine asks him why he scratches the sides of his nose and Juror Four replies "it's because of my glasses". Juror Nine points out that the women who testified and saw the murder had the same marks on the sides of his nose. He also adds that she kept rubbing her nose in court and that's another piece of evidence that she wore glasses. He talks about how women made an effort to look younger than her by wearing new clothes, lots of makeup and no glasses. In the play, there is no reference to this conversation between Juror Nine, Juror Four, and the other jurors about the glasses. In the room, Juror Eleven says, “The woman wore bifocals. I remember it very clearly. They looked pretty strong. This piece of evidence was exchanged between the play and the film. In the play they said she wore glasses in court while in the film the jurors came to the conclusion that she did not wear glasses but had small marks on the side of her noses that showed she was wearing them, but that just wasn't the case. day.ScenicingsAnother difference between the film Twelve Angry Men and the play was the difference in the stage directions and direction of the play. One important thing in stage directions is warmth. Once the jury has retired to the jury room, heat is the first topic among the men. The fan isn't working, so they open the windows, and a man explains that the news says today is the hottest day..