Adapted by many countries around the world, the democratic system continues to be an evolving topic of argument due to the requirement for the population to vote for a leader according to his personal choices and his understanding which will help the society to progress further thanks to its rationalities and its strengths in different sectors of the country such as politics, social sectors and the economy. Among the many people who oppose democracy is Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. who does not trust democracy. He chooses to focus on how our elected political representatives manipulate and deceive us (the mass majority) rather than highlighting the truth about our progress and problems as a society. Additionally, it targets the implications that corrupt and reckless leaders can have on society; poverty and famine are among these implications. Additionally, Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. points out the results of a dishonest leader who can create a chain effect by using all of society's resources for himself and leaving us citizens deprived of resources that we have. -created and over which we have lost control. Although he presents his arguments thoughtfully, errors are caught through the use of fallacies because these help us see through the flawed evidence that Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. failed to identify when presenting his arguments. Winkles begins his essay by describing what the media has told us about democracy and moves on to what President Bush once said about democracy. He had said that "everyone on earth is pretty much the same and we all just want to be free", which brings us to the first error of Winkle's essay. How can he say that everyone on earth is the same and middle of paper... which makes his essay weak in various ways, such as its lack of consideration of the positive effects of democracy. Winkle only focuses on the negative implications of democracy on a few countries (North Korea and Congo to be more specific) and does not mention other countries that have perfectly adapted to democracy and continue to develop in all countries. main sectors. Due to the weak arguments, lack of credible evidence, focus only on negative effects, and lack of erroneous judgments, Winkle fails to prove the truth of his main conclusion, although he establishes that he clearly rejects the idea of ​​democracy. He fails to establish why democracy is an insufficient system, because his arguments are constantly flawed. Therefore, I directly oppose his rejection of democracy because he fails to justify his judgments..