t May contributed to the next big addition in active noise control. They published a paper in 1953; their main idea was to make another object absorb the sound, and they envisioned using it in planes or cars (14). Additionally, William Conover was another inventor working in the 1950s. His ideas contrasted greatly with those of Olson and May, as he focused on the amplitude of sound waves while Olson and May had focused on general ideas rather than the scientific details of waves. By the late 1950s, no one had produced a machine that could effectively cancel sound, not because the inventors didn't understand the concepts, but because the technology needed was too advanced. After discussing the idea of sending sound waves to cancel out sound, the next question may arise: why not just block sound instead of trying to use opposing sound waves? This is the difference between active noise cancellation and passive control. Passive noise control technology involves...... middle of paper ......ation when cost-effectiveness is measured, so it would be less expensive than trying to muffle the sounds of hundreds of people and machines (Hansen 2). Overall, trying to create a machine that accurately measures sound when it produces an opposing wave is extremely difficult, and that's where the drawbacks lie. On the one hand, it takes many years of education to fully understand how sound waves work and how to create an active noise-canceling machine. The number of people available to install it is therefore limited, which therefore limits the range and speed of the sound. undo technology will become more widespread (Hansen 7). If more people don't understand how to install an active noise barrier, the idea cannot be as widespread as other scientific ideas that have many people around the world capable of applying it..

Essay / t May contributed to the next big addition in active noise control. They published a paper in 1953; their main idea was to make another object absorb the sound, and they envisioned using it in planes or cars (14). Additionally, William Conover was another inventor working in the 1950s. His ideas contrasted greatly with those of Olson and May, as he focused on the amplitude of sound waves while Olson and May had focused on general ideas rather than the scientific details of waves. By the late 1950s, no one had produced a machine that could effectively cancel sound, not because the inventors didn't understand the concepts, but because the technology needed was too advanced. After discussing the idea of sending sound waves to cancel out sound, the next question may arise: why not just block sound instead of trying to use opposing sound waves? This is the difference between active noise cancellation and passive control. Passive noise control technology involves...... middle of paper ......ation when cost-effectiveness is measured, so it would be less expensive than trying to muffle the sounds of hundreds of people and machines (Hansen 2). Overall, trying to create a machine that accurately measures sound when it produces an opposing wave is extremely difficult, and that's where the drawbacks lie. On the one hand, it takes many years of education to fully understand how sound waves work and how to create an active noise-canceling machine. The number of people available to install it is therefore limited, which therefore limits the range and speed of the sound. undo technology will become more widespread (Hansen 7). If more people don't understand how to install an active noise barrier, the idea cannot be as widespread as other scientific ideas that have many people around the world capable of applying it..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch