--------------Hook-------------The problem is that cyberbullying is an act that must stop, but there is no need to limit student speech online. If you are unfamiliar with the word cyberbullying, it refers to an individual who is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed, or otherwise targeted by another individual using the Internet, interactive, and digital technologies. But again, I emphasize that schools should not limit the amount of student speech online. Schools must protect students' First Amendment rights, but also maintain the learning environment and safety at school. Three main reasons why school should not limit student speech online are that there is not a large percentage of people affected, it does not cause about 75% (3 out of 4) of all girls have never been victims of cyberbullying. About 83% (5 out of 6) of all men have never experienced cyberbullying. If only 25.1% of girls reported being victims of cyberbullying and only 16.6% of all men reported being victims of cyberbullying, what is the point of limiting student speech? These percentages represent barely a quarter of the overall percentage. About 75% (3 out of 4) of all girls have never experienced cyberbullying. About 83% (5 out of 6) of all men have never experienced cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit student speech online, because the majority of students are not affected by cyberbullying, which does not warrant further reinforcements. In Document D, the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten-day suspension will not appear on their records. This must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students. In document C, the school suspended the student, but it was because the student threatened the targeted student, SN If the student did not target SN and If the students name her and make her harm directly, there will probably be no suspension. JS created a MySpace profile (“the Profile”) to make fun of his college principal, James McGonigle. The profile did not name the principal or his school, but included a photo of him and contained vulgar and offensive language. JS did not name the principal or the school, she did not directly target the principal even though a photo of the principal was on the page. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students' online speech because it has not caused substantial disruption. One reason schools should not limit student speech online is the violation of constitutional rights. We question reports of growing threats against online students. The number of young people using digital technologies is increasing rapidly, and online problems are also expected to increase. simply due to increased usage. Bullying also has a long history. The bullying occurred during