However, the second theory, according to which "social and economic inequalities must be organized so that they both benefit the least favored”, authorizes inequalities of treatment. under certain conditions. Freedoms can be restricted provided that these restrictions benefit everyone. In contradiction to this theory, natural law ethics supports the idea that the rightness of actions can be determined by nature itself, rather than by the laws, customs, or principles of society and individuals. This theory has strong implications for end-of-life issues. This theory suggests using ordinary means to find a cure or be cured, but there is no need to use extraordinary means. For me, I believe that every life has a purpose and helping others as much as possible, and if you have the ability to save a life by taking extraordinary measures, you should do it, which is one of the main reasons why I do not conform to the Natural Law of Ethics. As for virtue ethics, feminist ethics and care ethics, although I agree with many of their basic theories, for example, care ethics suggests acting in accordance with the values caring, being compassionate, sympathetic, kind and helpful. However, this theory, as well as the other two, offer no obvious way to resolve moral conflicts. Relating to the principles underlying virtue ethics, it is based on the idea that a person is predisposed to