I think the conflict in Syria violates just war theory. The rules of just war include the human right not to be killed or tortured, as well as that other countries must intervene during massacres and genocides. People's human rights are being denied, and intervention from the United States and other countries has done little or nothing to help them. Maybe it even made the situation worse. I have heard a lot about it since last summer, particularly about Aleppo. I wanted to understand why this started, so I found an article on the BBC called "Why is there war in Syria?" » from December 2016 to find out how it all started. I also read the articles “Executions in Syria: Did the Assad government pursue a “policy of extermination”? from the Christian Science Monitor and the New York Times' "Amnesty Report Accuses Syria of Executing Thousands Since War Started," as these were more recent articles from about a week, regarding the genocide of Syrian citizens by their own government. Say no to plagiarism. . Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'?Get the original essay Many Syrians were angered by unemployment and political corruption under President Bashar al-Assad, who succeeded his father in 2000. Then, in 2011, the Syrian government used deadly force against pro-democracy protesters in Daraa. This is a violation of human rights, which are part of just war. The protesters were not attacking people less powerful than themselves and they were killed by government force. The protests spread, people started arming themselves, and soon it was the all-out civil war we know today. The intervention of other countries prolonged the war. Due to the large number of human rights violations, other intervening countries would not violate the just war theory, but they would comply with it, with an obligation not to attack unless someone d no one else attacks first, or human rights are violated. Jihadist groups have gained more power in Syria due to the weakening of its state due to war. ISIS groups are fighting not only the Syrian government, but also rebels against the Syrian government and Kurdish groups. One of the actions taken by the United States was to launch airstrikes against the jihadists. I think this is acceptable under just war theory if it only kills jihadists. However, these can also eliminate innocent civilians, which would violate just war theory. The United States has armed moderate rebels, ensuring that weapons are not transferred from rebels to jihadists. I think this fits with the just war theory because the rebels can help overthrow the corrupt government. However, some of these weapons will inevitably end up in the hands of jihadists, as many have allied themselves with the rebels. The only way to truly avoid this is to send our own troops to fight the jihadists and overthrow the corrupt Syrian government. However, we would lose our own people, as well as a lot of money and resources. I believe that not intervening directly in Syria, where the government is committing genocide, could be a violation of just war theory. This is similar to the Clinton administration's refusal to intervene in Rwanda in the 1990s. We tried to do something to help the Syrians, but it is not enough because they continue to..