The Pros and Cons of NASA Funding Unfortunately, in recent years the government has cut funding for many NASA projects in an effort to reduce the deficit and stimulate the economy. Despite NASA's plummeting budget, the program has proven its importance in the United States, but space programs like NASA continue to struggle to increase their funds. Although NASA is in the lead Clearly, the government doesn't think NASA is worth more than 0.47 percent of the federal budget. NASA is underfunded and its funding would need to be significantly increased to make ends meet. This trend needs history. He succeeded in sending the first human into orbit and to the Moon. Discoveries made by NASA over the past several decades have allowed us to learn more about the planets and stars, as well as the resources far beyond this planet. On the other hand, the reasons why the US government should continue to fund NASA's space program are very important today. With the ideal that American taxpayer dollars should be spent on more important things and that companies are now able to build their own rockets capable of sending people on excursions into space, this is really what which calls into question government support and real improvement in poverty and health. - mind you, but in reality, NASA funding is only half a cent on the dollar, and the United States spends most of its deficit on war and other barbaric acts. About $2.9 trillion is spent on health care alone (Millman). The U.S. government spends just $17.7 billion on NASA and spends more than 36 times that amount on defense, or $647 billion, including nearly $20 billion in 2011 alone on tent air conditioning. . Since NASA's Cold War glory days, the budget has fallen from 4.41 percent of the total budget in 1966 to less than 0.45 percent today, its lowest level on record. NASA helped usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and was rewarded with a rapidly shrinking budget. The United States should invest more money in NASA and less in wasteful healthcare and the military. Budget cuts are affecting our technological development. Obviously, increasing NASA's budget to 1 percent of the federal budget won't hurt the economy. But instead, it would benefit it by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers. By increasing funds, it would support cutting-edge innovations in aviation and space technology, education and development that would help fuel the country's economy for years to come.

Essay / The Pros and Cons of NASA Funding Unfortunately, in recent years the government has cut funding for many NASA projects in an effort to reduce the deficit and stimulate the economy. Despite NASA's plummeting budget, the program has proven its importance in the United States, but space programs like NASA continue to struggle to increase their funds. Although NASA is in the lead Clearly, the government doesn't think NASA is worth more than 0.47 percent of the federal budget. NASA is underfunded and its funding would need to be significantly increased to make ends meet. This trend needs history. He succeeded in sending the first human into orbit and to the Moon. Discoveries made by NASA over the past several decades have allowed us to learn more about the planets and stars, as well as the resources far beyond this planet. On the other hand, the reasons why the US government should continue to fund NASA's space program are very important today. With the ideal that American taxpayer dollars should be spent on more important things and that companies are now able to build their own rockets capable of sending people on excursions into space, this is really what which calls into question government support and real improvement in poverty and health. - mind you, but in reality, NASA funding is only half a cent on the dollar, and the United States spends most of its deficit on war and other barbaric acts. About $2.9 trillion is spent on health care alone (Millman). The U.S. government spends just $17.7 billion on NASA and spends more than 36 times that amount on defense, or $647 billion, including nearly $20 billion in 2011 alone on tent air conditioning. . Since NASA's Cold War glory days, the budget has fallen from 4.41 percent of the total budget in 1966 to less than 0.45 percent today, its lowest level on record. NASA helped usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and was rewarded with a rapidly shrinking budget. The United States should invest more money in NASA and less in wasteful healthcare and the military. Budget cuts are affecting our technological development. Obviously, increasing NASA's budget to 1 percent of the federal budget won't hurt the economy. But instead, it would benefit it by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers. By increasing funds, it would support cutting-edge innovations in aviation and space technology, education and development that would help fuel the country's economy for years to come.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch