blog




  • Essay / Monitoring the credibility and content of web pages

    A website is used by different people for different purposes. Each website can be rated for its usefulness to the general public based on certain criteria discussed in this article. A website dealing with a particular condition like ADHD should be evaluated using the following criteria (Engle, 2014.), (“Evaluating Web Pages,” 2012), (Tillman, 2003): 1. Background and topic coverage: The visitor to such a website will be interested in learning about the disease, its treatment, medications, local support groups and different events associated with the disease, et al. too technical, basic or too advanced, should be examined It should be visually appealing and interesting to users through appropriate use of graphics.2. Credibility of the site should be analyzed with respect to the author, its date. of publication, its edited or revised version and its publisher.3. URL: The URL of the website and each of its web pages should give an idea of ​​the content of the web page.4 Proper format: The site should be easily. navigable from one topic/web page to another topic/web page Links should be easily visible. The site should be checked for links to other websites related to the topic.5. Reviews from other websites: The website may be rated based on statistics from sites like alexa.com. The better the ranking, the higher its reliability.6. Comparability with related sources: The website should provide relevant content on the content lines of other popular websites on the same topic.7. Software/Hardware/Multimedia Requirements: The website should be evaluated based on the ease of use of the website with few requirements of...... middle of paper ......94 globally . On average, there are only 4 page views per visitor and the bounce rate is 46.30%. Most of its visitors come from the United States (70.8%). It has two other ADHD-related sites and other helpful sites linked to chadd.org. or by providing links to this website. It needs to be worked on to improve its ranking. It has good website content comparable to other ADHD-related sites, but much more can still be incorporated to provide comprehensive coverage of the topic, as is found in sites like add.org. The website does not specify any specific software/hardware/multimedia requirements for browsing it. Since the Internet is free and unmonitored, the user must evaluate the content and credibility of the website based on individual needs. The criteria used to evaluate a website may vary from person to person..