The documentary “Under the Dome” exposed the harshness of the air pollution crisis in China. It has shown the detrimental effects this has on the millions of people who call the region home and exposes the companies that are responsible for allowing this to happen. This is because oil companies have extreme power in government environmental decision-making. All their environmental decisions have taken a back seat to ensure their economic interests are protected. Chai Jing not only exposes this crisis, but also shows the realistic outcome of what will happen if they continue doing what they are doing. Her passion stems from her son being a victim of China's air pollution problem and her extensive research led her to create this documentary which was a catalyst for promoting change in China's environmental policies and regulations . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an original essay The reason the documentary is banned where it was made is because it exposes the current nature of China's environment with a myriad of factual data to support it. More importantly, the documentary was banned because China's oil industries did not like being exposed to such a level. She analyzed air pollution over a long period of time and was able to highlight a significant problem with the way people lived, especially in Beijing. Although Beijing was one of the main affected cities, several other cities in the region have also been severely affected over the past 40 years due to the scale of air pollution. Chai Jing effectively made his case against a number of high-ranking government officials who put the lives of their own people at risk through their business practices. They valued money more than the health of their people and the members of the community they served. This shows how far these oil industries are willing to go to protect their economic interests. This is something that has spread all over the world. Many countries put their economic interests ahead of the environment because the world is governed by the value of the dollar. Saving the environment does not bring money into the economy, which is why there are few people investing in this area. This documentary demonstrates the impact that long-term pollution has had on the residents of such a densely populated area. This has exposed their population to increased risks of lung cancer and reduced growth of children in the region. The reason the video is so dangerous is because it is an issue that Chinese people have been facing for years and they are only just beginning to hear the consequences of the conditions they live in. Chinese residents would be angry watching this because their families' lives are at risk and this may explain some of the illnesses people have contracted. China is very densely populated, so when this video was released, it must have caused public outrage. People probably felt like they had been betrayed by their government and could potentially respond with an uproar. Mothers and fathers in the area are likely in shock as they try to understand the magnitude of the situation. Given that the situation hasn't improved much, it's no surprise that the documentary was banned. The government and oil companies feared people's reactionswho would watch the video, because they would know who was responsible for such extreme damage that affected their living conditions. Additionally, many people in China work in the iron, coal, and steel industries. Therefore, the number of jobs that would be lost due to the requirement for safer practices would be extreme. What's even worse is that in some cases the pollution is getting worse. This shows that even though people understand the issue of smog, ash and emissions from these factories that pollute the air, some choose to ignore them for their monetary gain. Societies around the world continue to fail to take environmental issues as seriously as they should. Many places do not see the ramifications of their actions that are harmful to the environment and therefore continue to implement them. Companies like Exxon have the money to be able to pay lobbyists and many other government officials so they can do whatever they want, regardless of their impact on the Earth. It has become very clear that money is the root of the problem of saving the environment. The investment necessary to safeguard the environment requires monetary sacrifices for environmental gains that cannot be quantified in dollars. People have a habit of waiting until the last second to make changes. With this problem, it's just the same thing. Our government will not make the environment a priority because this problem is more widespread than it seems and it is a problem that must be solved immediately. There have been several cases over time where environmental atrocities have decimated land for economic gain. Places like Mexico City and Los Angeles have suffered a lot of environmental damage due to the severe pollution these cities have been exposed to. Los Angeles has been very successful in recent years in cleaning up air pollution in the city. This arises from the implementation of newer technologies as well as the assistance of new policies and regulations. Over the past 40 years, signs of smog have covered Mexico City. This is why Mexico City was recently known for having the worst smog in the world. Poor air quality has led to thousands of deaths and many more hospital visits. The people of Mexico City fought back and were able to gain major leverage in the fight for cleaner air. The population forced the government to work for cleaner air and its efforts were rewarded. After pushing factories to adopt more energy-efficient methods, the amount of air pollution hovering over the city decreased significantly. The silver lining is that Mexico City is now a model that other cities can follow in their mission to combat air pollution. People have forgotten about these environmental atrocities because they simply don't care much. Many people around the world believe that the environmental problems we see every day will go away or will take care of themselves. This is an ignorance that is perpetuated by the media who do not pay enough attention to issues like this. If more people could see the before and after effects of being persistent and caring for their environment, it would do wonders in allowing people to understand the magnitude of the effect they could have on their habitat. The rumor that has circulated in communities across the country over the past two years is that trying to save the environment will do no good because it is already too late. The mindset that needs to be adopted is that if people.