Confusion can certainly be an asset when exploring investigative arguments. This is based on the fact that the argument is not simple and has multiple explanations or causes. Therefore, researchers need to study this argument thoroughly before drawing a rational conclusion on these issues. Confusion, rather than certainty, will require the study and investigation of many more questions. In doing so, the individual will certainly develop a clearer and more valid explanation of their argument. If someone knows a lot about the argument, they will do minimal work, while if they are confused, a lot of research and digging will be required to discover the truth underlying such topics. An asset is like an advantage; therefore, confusion is an asset in discerning the truth about the subject being studied. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay I think being open to all the questions around me would be very important when coming up with arguments. Often I feel like most of us are very closed-minded when considering topics for discussion. We have predefined notions and beliefs that greatly limit what we produce, but this only prevents us from grasping the truth. I think one factor that isn't very helpful would be that exploring free writing wouldn't be that helpful. This step simply allows for reflection and the free flow of ideas, which is not necessary in the process. I say this because we must do this when constructing the argument. I would much rather produce complete, logical ideas after fully considering the argument, than have a page full of incomplete thoughts. Elements of a genre can surely affect an argument in several ways. For example, one element of genre is whether it is fiction or non-fiction. If it is not fiction, we can be assured that the information is factual and supported by data. However, if it is fiction, we should not believe what is said as real knowledge supported by data. Non-fiction is usually very serious, while its counterpart is not. The argument is factual most often in nonfiction. Genre can also be related to where the article is published, whether in a magazine, newspaper, or online forum. The credibility and the audience it is addressed to will be affected by such means. A prestigious magazine, for example, will be more credible than a blog article on an argument. The writer should always have a specific audience and goal in mind when writing the argument. This is true because without it, the desired results are unlikely to be successful. For example, in the textbook, Trudie's Freewrite article aims to raise awareness of the inequalities faced by those in minimum wage jobs. The author has this specific goal in mind, and the intended audience is those who earn such salaries, as well as anyone who can relate to these issues. Without this, the author would probably not achieve the desired results. However, by placing this short essay in an academic textbook, the purpose and intended audience can be achieved simultaneously. Truth seeking and persuasion are extremely important factors when discussing the defense of an argument. Advocacy basically refers to certain recommendations or desired outcomes that one desires when writing about a specific topic. Therefore, the author of the article should search for the.