IntroductionTerrorism has become a global threat. Different terrorist factions are driven by different ideologies, amplified by specific influential leaders within those factions. This article explores the different ideologies of support and negation of the environment. More specifically, this article adopts a debate approach between two individuals sharing different views on terrorism. This is a dialogue between Andrew who opposes terrorist ideas and Fayed who supports terrorist ideas. This article argues that subjective stereotyping practiced by various governments gives the impression that terrorist factions are always wrong while these governments continue to kill mercilessly in the name of democracy and maintaining national integrity. The Terrorists' Tacit Message Argument According to Fay, it is clear that before September 11, 2001, terrorism was a misconception that could only operate with limited capabilities. They had little funding and their capabilities were limited to the funds they could obtain. This made it difficult for these factions to cause global chaos, especially in countries like the United States (Saleem and Thomas 15). Nevertheless, the fact that terrorist factions can infiltrate such a superpower indicates that these factions have acquired a new dimension and motivation. More importantly, they are capable of both threatening high-ranking government officials and even attacking others in various countries around the world. The main objective of the terrorist faction is to instill fear in the hearts of men and is therefore a scourge that must be eliminated by all possible means. It is therefore the responsibility of all governments to eradicate terrorist factions by all possible means, including targeted attacks against terrorists...... middle of paper ....... Indirect responsibility in terrorist acts: redefinition of the concept of terrorism beyond violent acts. Leiden [Netherlands]: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 2009. Discovery eBooks. Internet. July 5, 2014.Moghaddam, Fathali M. From the terrorists' point of view: what they experience and why they come to destroy. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2006. Discovery eBooks. Internet. July 5, 2014. Oh, Onook, Manish Agrawal and H. Raghav Rao. “Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Theoretical Analysis of Rumor Tweets During Social Crises.” MIS Quarterly 37.2 (2013): 407-A7. Commercial source completed. Internet. July 5, 2014. Saleem, Mohammed M. and Michael K. Thomas. “Reporting the September 11 Terrorist Attacks in American Social Studies Textbooks: A Muslim Perspective.” High School Journal 95.1 (2011): 15-33. Premier Academic Research. Internet. July 5 2014.