Since 1992, the EPR has conducted 70 country reviews, the majority comprising reviews of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, although an increasing number of partner countries are participating. The current review cycle examines the main environmental trends in a given country, the national policy framework, environmental governance systems, recognition of environmental policies in economic strategy, including through taxation or pricing mechanisms. Additionally, the country under review will be asked to choose two particularly important and locally relevant topics for in-depth review. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay Data collection is carried out by the EPR Secretariat and uses external and OECD data sources, including including environmental statistics provided by the OECD Working Party on Environmental Information (WPEI). ). After data collection, a review team visits the country under review and participates in meetings with various state and non-state actors. Typically, high-level government representatives would lead the delegations of the countries under review. In addition to providing country-specific recommendations, the peer review discussions highlight lessons learned from other participating countries that could lead to broader policy adoptions. The final reports are made public at high-profile events and their findings are widely disseminated to policymakers, civil society organizations and the general public. OECD member states and selected partner countries are all subject to review. Additionally, UNECE has requested assistance from the OECD to design an environmental review mechanism for UNECE member countries that are not part of the OECD. Each country is reviewed every 7-8 years and the third cycle of reviews is currently underway. Progress reports are prepared on a voluntary basis by the countries reviewed. Each country subject to a subsequent review is also assessed in terms of its implementation of the recommendations of the previous review. Such a process of monitoring and evaluation at the regional level has inspired some national policy reforms, such as the green tax reforms in Denmark and France. , as well as the creation of an environmental agency in New Zealand and the Ministry of the Environment in Chile. This review mechanism can also promote cross-sector collaboration and motivate policy alignment, particularly in countries with nascent environmental administration. Such peer reviews can empower reviewed parties by informing, learning and developing policies, and increasing policy legitimacy. Indeed, the OECD states that “recommendations resulting from such a review can also help governments gain domestic support for difficult measures.” Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay OECD's experience and reputation as a pioneer in peer review helps attract policy and public attention and acceptance..