Porush's argument emphasizes that research questions are an integral part of a research and research processes such as designing and choosing which methods to use. Krueckeberg (2011:1) gave a lecture on the difference between a bad question and a good question: they are debatable, narrow, meaningful and researchable. That a question is debatable, simple means that it has already been debated and this is the very reason for the recognition of scientific articles. Krueckeberg further clarified that a research question must be narrow, referring to the fact that one will need to be able to give a credible answer to the question in a more concise format. The importance of a question lies in whether there is something at stake or an advantage in the answer arising from a successful answer to the question. The question should be researchable through primary and secondary sources. Whether or not it is a small independent study, a mini-research for an undergraduate course or a formal thesis or dissertation depends on the quality of a research question Maree (2011:2). To Neuman (2003: 163) deliberates on good and bad research questions and gives explicit examples of bad questions; should abortion be legal? Do police affect crime and how does poverty affect children? The argument made by Neuman is that such questions cannot be tested empirically or that they are unscientific questions..