Each era gives birth to its own heroes. Starting with the glory days of ancient Greece and the Roman Empire with Aristotle, Heracles and Alexander the Great, through the Dark Ages when Saint Thomas and Roger Bacon created eternity and ending with the creators of modern times - Eddisson and Enshtein, the Humanity created idealistic images of its best representatives. Formally, Kant was Newton's ideological opponent, the rational genius, who brought knowledge and mind into existence on the level of God. Kant, the creator of the first scientific model of the creation of stars and planets, arrived at the position of the limits of practical morality. “The Critique of Practical Reason” is the second after Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. There he describes “practical activity” as opposed to prudent practice. Modern-day philosophers assumed that the human mind is the most powerful thing and its capabilities are unlimited, and that other laws and principles follow from the laws of the mind. In “Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant concludes that the human mind is limited by the realm of human practice and, more importantly, by its morality and religion. In “Critique of Pure Reason,” he asserts that God created the abilities of the human mind, just to remain the place of religion. This also includes, according to the philosopher, that morality is based on religion, and not the other way around. In the practice of the scientific and political world, Kant opposes the question of morality, which is essential in this regard. Morality distinguishes human beings from animals. But where does it come from? This is the important question for Kant. Like the question of creation “the will is a... middle of paper ......iosity of someone more naive. With kind regards, Yours A. Einstein » It's hard to disagree with genius. For those who might doubt the relevance of Kant's work, the example of the accident that occurred in the Russian city of Rostov-na-Donu. As the newspaper Vesti.ru writes, police officers arrested a young man suspected of having shot an opponent during an argument over the work of the philosopher Immanuel Kant. Two young men argued about the work of the philosopher, the argument raised the urgency of the problem, then one of them took the traumatic pistol and shot an opponent in the head. Although it should be emphasized that men, in their practical actions, were contrary to Kant's moral ideas, such is the fate of many brilliant ideas, regardless of the era in which they were formulated, and for which the humanity will grow for a long time to come..