AppeasementThe task of explaining why appeasement has been continually addressed by historians over the years. To date, no single cause has yet been identified. Nevertheless, there is a general consensus among historians that the appalling events of the First World War instilled a sense of fear and regret within British society and that, as a result, Britain became endeavored to prevent any future war, by any means necessary. In the aftermath of the First World War, the British government and society agreed that a catastrophe like the First World War should never happen again. It was described as the "war to end all wars", reinforcing the idea that it was a "war to end all wars". cataclysmic event that should never happen again in society. The British public was disillusioned with the use of force in international relations and therefore sought an approach consisting of an effective system of collective security. In post-war society, anti-war books, films and poems became increasingly appreciated and several peace pressure groups were formed with the sole aim of achieving peaceful solutions to international problems. These groups were known as The Peace Pledge Union, The Peace Society and No More War Movement. The First World War essentially left Britain in a state of mourning, and as a result thousands of war monuments were erected, and an annual day of mourning and remembrance was established, known as Easter Sunday. Memory. This was an attempt to pay tribute to the heroes lost in the war and as a subtle reminder of the devastation caused by the war in an attempt to prevent any future conflict. Due to the desolation, a common consensus became apparent among the general public that there were no clear societal gains from the war and the country's obvious economic and political decline showed no gains in this sector. more. This is why arms reduction and peace have become winners in elections. Appeasement can be defined as “a willingness to avoid conflict through judicious concessions and negotiations.” Neville Chamberlain emphasized that the British public would neither wish nor accept another war. The British government therefore sought to follow a policy of appeasement. However, not everyone shared acceptance of the policy of appeasement. In hindsight, many historians have condemned Chamberlai's actions...... middle of paper ......nland. Opinions are divided regarding this policy and on the question of why historians have continually debated appeasement over the intervening decades. Many believe that Chamberlain's policy of appeasement was motivated by a desire to do everything in his power to avoid war and by his belief that all European powers shared this sentiment. The catastrophic events of World War I instilled in many a deep fear and hatred of war. It is also believed that Chamberlain followed the policy of appeasement as a means to buy time, as he realized that Britain's defenses were hopelessly insufficient, with Britain's military strength having been significantly reduced due to the commitment of the disarmament. Even at the time of the Anschluss, Britain was declared unprepared for war. In conclusion, whatever the reasons for the continued policy of appeasement, we can say that appeasement with the sole aim of preventing..